Referencias Bibliográficas

1. Simpson KR. Trends in Labor Induction in the United States, 1989 to 2020. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2022;47(4):235. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000824 [ Links ]

2. Carlhäll S, Alsweiler J, Battin M, Wilson J, Sadler L, Thompson JMD, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes at early vs. full term following induction of labor; A secondary analysis of the OBLIGE randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(5):95564. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14775 [ Links ]

3. Fonseca MJ, Santos F, Afreixo V, Silva IS, Almeida MDC. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;253:2139. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022 [ Links ]

4. Pfleiderer M, Gilman E, Grüttner B, Ratiu J, Mallmann P, Baek S, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome after induction of labor versus expectant management in lowrisk pregnancies beyond term. 2024;38(1):299307. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13439. [ Links ]

5. Kim HI, Choo SP, Han SW, Kim EH. Benefits and risks of induction of labor at 39 or more weeks in uncomplicated nulliparous women: a retrospective, observational study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(1):1926. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.1.19 [ Links ]

6. CozziGlaser GD, Blanchard CT, Stanford JN, Oben AG, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, et al. Outcomes in lowrisk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39week elective induction of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2295223. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2295223 [ Links ]

7. Lee S, Cha DH, Park CW, Kim EH. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 or more weeks: A prospective, observational study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;13(1):38. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010038 [ Links ]

8. Lee DS, Tandel MD, Kwan L, Francoeur AA, Duong HL, Negi M. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(2):100534. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100534 [ Links ]

9. Zhou H, Gu N, Yang Y, Wang Z, Hu Y, Dai Y. Nomogram predicting cesarean delivery undergoing induction of labor among highrisk nulliparous women at term: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12884022043868 [ Links ]

10. Deif O, Messallami ME, Diab Y. Transvaginal ultrasound versus bishop score in predicting labour dystocia at fullterm nullipara undergoing labour induction. J Family Reprod Health. 2024;18(1):5359. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i1.15439 [ Links ]

11. Abdullah ZHA, Chew KT, Velayudham VRV, Yahaya Z, Jamil AAM, Abu MA, et al. Preinduction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospitalbased comparative clinical trial. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262387 [ Links ]

12. Shi Q, Wang Q, Tian S, Wang Q, Lv C. Assessment of different sonographic cervical measures to predict labor induction outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(12):846277. doi: 10.21037/qims23507 [ Links ]

13. Mönckeberg M, Valdés R, Kusanovic JP, Schepeler M, Nien JK, Pertossi E, et al. Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intraamniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis. J Perinat Med. 2019;47(5):5009. doi: 10.1515/jpm20180388 [ Links ]

14. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):56772. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904 [ Links ]

15. Reicher L, Fouks Y, Yogev Y. Cervical assessment for predicting preterm birthcervical length and beyond. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):627. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040627 [ Links ]

16. Kim YN, Kwon JY, Kim EH. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(7):10771083. doi: 10.1111/jog.14270 [ Links ]

17. Chung SH, Kong MK, Kim EH, Han SW. Sonographically accessed funneling of the uterine cervix as a predictor of successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58(3):18895. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.188 [ Links ]

18. Degani N, Sikich N. Caesarean delivery rate review: An evidencebased analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015 Mar 1;15(9):158. [ Links ]

19. Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Plusajska J, Detka K, Bialek K, Swiercz G. Repeatability and reproducibility of potential ultrasonographic bishop score parameters. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4492. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134492 [ Links ]

20. Dîra L, Dragusin RC, SoropFlorea M, Tudorache S, Cara ML, Iliescu DG. Can we use the bishop score as a prediction tool for the mode of delivery in primiparous women at term before the onset of labor? Curr Health Sci J. 2021;47(1):6874. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.47.01.11 [ Links ]

21. Ducarme G, Planche L, Lbakhar M. Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening among women with gestational diabetes mellitus at term: A prospective study. J Clin Med. 2023;13(1):139. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010139 [ Links ]

22. Kehila M, Abouda HS, Sahbi K, Cheour H, Chanoufi MB. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2016;9(2):127-31. doi: 10.3233/NPM16915111 [ Links ]

23. Yellon SM. Contributions to the dynamics of cervix remodeling prior to term and preterm birth. Biol Reprod. 2017;96(1):1323. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.142844 [ Links ]

24. Jo YS, Jang DG, Kim N, Kim SJ, Lee G. Comparison of cervical parameters by threedimensional ultrasound according to parity and previous delivery mode. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(8):6738. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.673 [ Links ]

25. Mukherji J, Bhadra A, Ghosh SK, Hazra A, Anant M, Bhattacharya SK, et al. Cervical length measurement in nulliparous women at term by ultrasound & its relationship to spontaneous onset of labour. Indian J Med Res. 2017;146(4):498504. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_881_15 [ Links ]

26. Kim YN, Kwon JY, Kim EH. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(7):107783. doi: 10.1111/jog.14270 [ Links ]

27. Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Preinduction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(5):38993. doi: 10.1111/j.1479828X.2007.00762.x [ Links ]

28. Kant RH, Bashir A, Gupta S. Study of transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervix in predicting the success of labour induction in nulliparous women. JK Science. 2016;18(1):611. [ Links ]