Referencias Bibliográficas

1. Agrawal A, Wenger NK. Hypertension During Pregnancy. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Aug 27;22(9):64. doi: 10.1007/s11906020010700 [ Links ]

2. Lugones Botell M. La cesárea en la historia. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2001;27(1):536. [ Links ]

3. Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. StatPearls (Internet) Updated July 9, 2023. Copyright (c) 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546707/ [ Links ]

4. Guevara Ríos E. Cesárea a solicitud materna. Rev peru ginecol obstet. 2023;69(2). doi: 10.31403/rpgo.v67i2302 [ Links ]

5. Hoxha I, Lama A, Bunjaku G, Grezda K, Agahi R, Beqiri P, Goodman DC. Office hours and caesarean section: systematic review and Metaanalysis. Res Health serv Reg. 22 June 2022;1(4). Doi: 10.1007/s43999022000026 [ Links ]

6. Faundes A. La evolución histórica de la tasa de la cesárea: de una excepción en la antigüedad a un exceso en la actualidad. Rev peru ginecol obstet. 2021;67(1). https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v67i2302 [ Links ]

7. Cífková R. Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023;30:289-303. doi: 10.1007/s40292023005825 [ Links ]

8. Amorim MMR, Souza AR, Katz L. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe preeclampsia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD009430. DOI: 10.1002/14651858 [ Links ]

9. Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GM. Caesarean section for nonmedical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004660.pub3 [ Links ]

10. Ramírez Cabrera J, Cabrera Ramos S, Campos Siccha G, Peláez Chomba M, Poma Morales C. Histerectomía obstétrica en el Hospital San Bartolomé, Lima, 2003 - 2015. Rev peru ginecol obstet. 2017;63(1):27-33. [ Links ]

11. Berghella V, Lockwood CJ, Barss VA. Patient education: Csection. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6728#:~:text=%E2%97%8F%20Cesarean%20delivery%20is%20associated%20with%20a%20higher,interfere%20with%20motherinfant%20interaction%20in%20the%20delivery%20room [ Links ]

12. de Brito Cançado TO, Omais M, Ashmawi HA, Torres ML. Chronic pain after cesarean section. Influence of anesthetic/ surgical technique and postoperative analgesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 NovDec;62(6):76274. doi: 10.1016/S00347094(12)701770 [ Links ]

13. Budny-Winska J, Pomorski M. Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods. Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(10):72630. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0195 [ Links ]

14. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):1429. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007. [ Links ]

15. Epub 2012 Mar 10. Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;210(4):3714. PMID: 22516620 [ Links ]

16. Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M. Shortterm and longterm effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):134957. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(18)319305 [ Links ]

17. Dahlquist K, Stuart A, Källén K. Planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery among women without formal medical indication for planned cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study of maternal shortterm complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Sep;101(9):102632. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14408 [ Links ]

18. Carrapato MRG, Ferreira AM, Wataganara T. Cesarean section: the pediatricians' views. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Sep;30(17):20815. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1237496 [ Links ]

19. Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017 Feb 17;9:8188. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876 [ Links ]

20. Suárez-Torres I, ReynaVillasmil E. Compresa quirúrgica retenida posterior a cesárea electiva. Rev peru ginecol obstet. 2017;63(1):10912. [ Links ]

21. Poole JH. Adhesions following cesarean delivery: a review of their occurrence, consequences and preventative management using adhesion barriers. Womens Health (Lond). 2013 Sep;9(5):46777. doi: 10.2217/whe.13.45 [ Links ]

22. Garvi Morcillo J, Monzón Castillo EP, Tejada Martínez G, Gutiérrez Salas N, Páucar Espinal G. Gestación ectópica sobre cicatriz de cesárea. Rev peru ginecol obstet. Nov 2022;68(4). doi: 10.31403/rpgo.v68i2460 [ Links ]

23. Gao L, Chen H, Liu J, Wang M, Lin F, Yang G, Lash GE, Li P. Extravillous trophoblast invasion and decidualization in cesarean scar pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Oct;101(10):11208. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14435 [ Links ]

24. Kennedy A, Debbink M, Griffith A, Kaiser J, Woodward P. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A DoNotMiss Diagnosis. Radiographics. 2024 Jul;44(7):e230199. doi: 10.1148/rg.230199 [ Links ]

25. Fernández-Navarro M, PinillosPeralta M, MiresMontoro V, UrbinaGordillo C. Embarazo ectópico en cicatriz de cesárea: reporte de un caso. Acta med Peru. Oct. 2023;40(3). doi: 10.35663/amp.2023.403.2562 [ Links ]

26. Bekiesinska-Figatowska M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2020 May 27;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13244020008765 [ Links ]

27. Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjærven R, Tanbo T, Forsén L, Åbyholm T, Vangen S. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a populationbased registry study of lowrisk primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s1288401610283 [ Links ]

28. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesáreas. WHO/RHR/14 de abril de 2015:8 pag. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/161444/WHO_RHR_15.02_spa.pdf?sequence=1 [ Links ]

29. Sosa C, de Mucio B, Colomar M. Mainero L, Costa ML, Guida JP, et al. The impact of maternal morbidity on cesarean section rates: exploring a Latin American network of sentinel facilities using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023;23:605. Doi: 10.1186/s12884023059373 [ Links ]

30. Nações Unidas, Brasil, Estudo a OMS revela que número de cesarianas aumenta, mas desigualdades no acesso persiste. 17 junio 2021. https://brasil.un.org/ptbr/131934estudoomsrevelaquen%C3%BAmerodecesarianasaumentamasdesigualdadenoacessopersiste [ Links ]

31. Cambricoli F. Índice de cesáreas volta a subir no Brasil e bate recordé durante a pandemia; entenda por qué. Estadão. Jan 12, 2023. https://www.estadao.com.br/saude/numerodecesareasvoltaasubirnobrasilebaterecordeduranteapandemia/ [ Links ]

32. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática Perú. El 37,8% de los nacimientos registrados se dieron mediante cesárea en el año 2023. 23/05/2024. https://www.inei.gob.pe/prensa/noticias/el378delosnacimientosregistradossedieronmediantecesareaenelano202315173/ [ Links ]

33. Barrena Neyra M, Quispesaravia Ildefonso P, Flores Noriega M, Leon Rabanal C. Frecuencia e indicaciones del parto por cesárea en un hospital docente de Lima, Perú. Rev peru ginecol obstet. 2020;66(2). https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v66i2246 [ Links ]

34. Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Hajimiri K, Betran AP, Jahanfar S, Bohren MA, et al. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixedmethods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 2;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s1297802001047x [ Links ]

35. Kietpeerakool, C., Lumbiganon, P., Laopaiboon, M. Rattanakanokchai S, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu M. Pregnancy outcomes of women with previous caesarean sections: Secondary analysis of World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9748. Doi: 10.1038/s41598019461534 [ Links ]

36. Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):1925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.19 [ Links ]

37. Christensen K, Ostersen LH, Glavind K, Krarup AL, Kjærgaard N. Acute colonic pseudoobstruction after cesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:41823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.011 [ Links ]

38. Reynolds IS, McDermott E, Liddy R, Aird JJ, Flood K, McCormack O, Geoghegan T, Brannigan AE. Acute colonic pseudoobstruction postcesarean section is not a benign entity: A case series and review of the literature. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;165(1):5966. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15086 [ Links ]

39. Larsson C, Matsson A, Mooe T, Söderström L, Tunón K, Nordin P. Cardiovascular complications following cesarean section and vaginal delivery: a national populationbased study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):80729. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1941851 [ Links ]

40. Mayo Clinic Staff. Csection. Tests and Procedures. June 16, 2022. https://www.mayoclinic.org/testsprocedures/csection/about/pac20393655 [ Links ]

41. AndersonBagga FM, Sze A. Placenta Previa. [Updated 2023 Jun 12]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539818/ [ Links ]

42. Takeda S, Takeda J, Makino S. Cesarean Section for Placenta Previa and Placenta Previa Accreta Spectrum. Surg J (N Y). 2020 Mar 9;6(Suppl 2):S110S121. doi: 10.1055/s00393402036 [ Links ]

43. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline No. 402: Venu J, Bos H, Bujold E. Diagnosis and Management of Placenta Previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada, July 2020;42(7):90617.e1 [ Links ]

44. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Obstetric Care Consensus Number 7 December 2018 (Replaces Committee Opinion No. 529, July 2012. Reaffirmed 2021) https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinicalguidance/obstetriccareconsensus/articles/2018/12/placentaaccretaspectrum [ Links ]

45. Brubaker LH, Paul IM, Repke JT, Kjerulff KH. Early mater nalnewborn contact and positive birth experience. Birth. 2019 Mar;46(1):4250. doi: 10.1111/birt.12378 [ Links ]

46. Santos Neto CHD, Oliveira FS, Gomes GF, Araujo Júnior E, Nakamura MU, Souza E. Type of Childbirth and its Association with the MaternalFilial Interaction. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Oct;42(10):597606. English. doi: 10.1055/s00401712133 [ Links ]

47. Boutsikou T, MalamitsiPuchner A. Caesarean section: impact on mother and child. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Dec;100(12):151822. doi: 10.1111/j.16512227.2011.02477.x [ Links ]

48. Lupu VV, Miron IC, Raileanu AA, Starcea IM, Lupu A, Tarca E, Mocanu A, Buga AML, Lupu V, Fotea S. Difficulties in Adaptation of the Mother and Newborn via Cesarean Section versus Natural BirthA Narrative Review. Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;13(2):300. doi: 10.3390/life13020300 [ Links ]

49. Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):27687. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009 [ Links ]

50. Paixao ES, Bottomley C, Pescarini JM, Wong KLM, Cardim LL, RibeiroSilva RC, et al. Associations between cesarean delivery and child mortality: A national record linkage longitudinal study of 17.8 million births in Brazil. PLoS Med. 2021. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.1003791 [ Links ]

51. TiconaHuanco D, TiconaRendón M, HuancoApaza D, GarcíaMontenegro V, VargasZeballos J. Análisis de la cesárea según la clasificación de Robson en un hospital público de Perú. Ginecol obstet México. 2029;87(10):62636. doi: 10.24245/gom.v87i10.3301 [ Links ]

52. Eftekharian C, Husslein PW, Lehner R. Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10Group Classification System. Matern Child Health J. 2021 Sep;25(9):147481. doi: 10.1007/s10995021031837 [ Links ]

53. Neonatal Outcomes in FullTerm Pregnancies. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;188(4):67483. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz014 [ Links ]

54. Slabuszewska-Józwiak A, Szymanski JK, Ciebiera M, SareckaHujar B, Jakiel G. Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean SectionA Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 31;17(21):8031. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218031 [ Links ]

55. Rutayisire E, Wu X, Huang K, Tao S, Chen Y, Tao F. Cesarean section may increase the risk of both overweight and obesity in preschool children. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s1288401611315 [ Links ]

56. Zhang S, Zhou J, Yang M, Zhang F, Tao X, Tao F, Huang K. Sexspecific association between elective cesarean section and growth trajectories in preschool children: A prospective birth cohort study. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:985851. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985851 [ Links ]

57. Magne F, Puchi Silva A, Carvajal B, Gotteland M. The Elevated Rate of Cesarean Section and Its Contribution to NonCommunicable Chronic Diseases in Latin America: The Growing Involvement of the Microbiota. Front Pediatr. 2017 Sep 4;5:192. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00192 [ Links ]

58. Chen M, Lin Y, Yu C, Fu R, Shentu H, Yao J, Huang J, He Y, Yu M. Effect of cesarean section on the risk of autism spectrum disorders/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in offspring: a metaanalysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;309(2):43955. doi: 10.1007/s00404023070599 [ Links ]

59. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Jul;37(7):8939. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.195 [ Links ]

60. Masukume G, McCarthy FP, Russell J, Baker PN, Kenny LC, Morton SM, Khashan AS. Caesarean section delivery and childhood obesity: evidence from the growing up in New Zealand cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Dec;73(12):106370. doi: 10.1136/jech2019212591 [ Links ]

61. Mueller NT, Mao G, Bennet WL, Hourigan SK, DominguezBello MG, Appel LJ, Wang X. Does vaginal delivery mitigate or strengthen the intergenerational association of overweight and obesity? Findings from the Boston Birth Cohort. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Apr;41(4):497501. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.219 [ Links ]

62. Li N, Liang S, Chen Q, Zhao L, Li B, Huo G. Distinct gut microbiota and metabolite profiles induced by delivery mode in healthy Chinese infants. J Proteomics. 2021 Feb 10;232:104071. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.104071 [ Links ]

63. Dominguez-Bello MG, De JesusLaboy KM, Shen N, Cox LM, Amir A, Gonzalez A, Bokulich NA, Song SJ, Hoashi M, RiveraVinas JI, Mendez K, Knight R, Clemente JC. Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesareanborn infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):2503. doi: 10.1038/nm.4039 [ Links ]

64. Inchingolo F, Inchingolo AD, Palumbo I, Trilli I, Guglielmo M, Mancini A, Palermo A, Inchingolo AM, Dipalma G. The Impact of Cesarean Section Delivery on Intestinal Microbiota: Mechanisms, Consequences, and PerspectivesA Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 15;25(2):1055. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021055 [ Links ]

65. Singh SB, Madan J, Coker M, Hoen A, Baker ER, Karagas MR, Mueller NT. Does birth mode modify associations of maternal prepregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain with the infant gut microbiome? Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Jan;44(1):2332. doi: 10.1038/s4136601802730 [ Links ]

66. Tun HM, Bridgman SL, Chari R, Field CJ, Guttman DS, Becker AB, Mandhane PJ, Turvey SE, Subbarao P, Sears MR, Scott JA, Kozyrskyj AL; Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Study Investigators. Roles of Birth Mode and Infant Gut Microbiota in Intergenerational Transmission of Overweight and Obesity From Mother to Offspring. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr 1;172(4):36877. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5535 [ Links ]

67. Butel MJ, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, WydauDematteis S. The developing gut microbiota and its consequences for health. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018 Dec;9(6):5907. doi: 10.1017/S2040174418000119 [ Links ]

68. Martin JA, Osterman MJK. Shifts in the Distribution of Births by Gestational Age: United States, 20142022. National Vital Statistical Reports. Jan, 2024. [ Links ]

69. Cheong JLY, Burnett AC, Treyvaud K, Spittle AJ. Early environment and longterm outcomes of preterm infants. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020 Jan;127(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s0070201902121w [ Links ]

70. Wang FF, Yu T, Chen XL, Luo R, Mu DZ. Cerebral palsy in children born after assisted reproductive technology: a metaanalysis. World J Pediatr. 2021 Aug;17(4):36474. doi: 10.1007/s1251902100442z [ Links ]

71. Vazquez Corona M, Betrán AP, Bohren MA. The portrayal and perceptions of cesarean section in Mexican media Facebook pages: a mixedmethods study. Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978022013518 [ Links ]

72. Dumont A, de Loenzien M, Nhu HMQ, Dugas M, Kabore C, Lumbiganon P, Torloni MR, Gialdini C, Carroli G, Hanson C, Betrán AP; QUALIDEC consortium. Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for lowrisk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low and middleincome countries. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;2(11):e0001264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264 [ Links ]

73. Turner MJ. Delivery after a previous cesarean section reviewed. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;163(3):75762. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14854 [ Links ]

74. Pacheco Romero J, Távara Orozco L. Woman Centered Medicine and Health. Editorial. Rev peru ginecol obstet. 2023;69(3). DOI: 10.31403/rpgo.v69i2562 [ Links ]

75. Carrapato MRG, Ferreira AM, Wataganara T. Cesarean section: the pediatricians' views. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Sep;30(17):208185. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1237496 [ Links ]