Burstein HJ. Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2557–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1307118.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, Matos L, Gelmon K, Aapro MS, et al. 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). Breast. 2024;76: 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103756.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu C, Ma G, Zhang J, Cheng J, Yang Z, Song S. (18)F-FES and (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging as a predictive biomarkers for metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors with endocrine treatment. Ann Nucl Med. 2023;37:675–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-023-01871-8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu C, Hu S, Xu X, Zhang Y, Wang B, Song S, et al. Evaluation of tumour heterogeneity by (18)F-fluoroestradiol PET as a predictive measure in breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment. Breast Cancer Res. 2022;24:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-022-01555-7.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boers J, Venema CM, de Vries EFJ, Glaudemans A, Kwee TC, Schuuring E, et al. Molecular imaging to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who benefit from endocrine treatment combined with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition. Eur J Cancer. 2020;126:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.024.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Witkiewicz AK, Schultz E, Wang J, Hamilton D, Levine E, O’Connor T, et al. Determinants of response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in the real-world setting. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023;7:90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00438-0.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Criscitiello C, André F, Thompson AM, De Laurentiis M, Esposito A, Gelao L, et al. Biopsy confirmation of metastatic sites in breast cancer patients: clinical impact and future perspectives. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3630.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lindström LS, Karlsson E, Wilking UM, Johansson U, Hartman J, Lidbrink EK, et al. Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2601–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.2482.
Aitken SJ, Thomas JS, Langdon SP, Harrison DJ, Faratian D. Quantitative analysis of changes in ER, PR and HER2 expression in primary breast cancer and paired nodal metastases. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1254–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp427.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Linden HM, Stekhova SA, Link JM, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Ellis GK, et al. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2793–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.3810.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peterson LM, Kurland BF, Schubert EK, Link JM, Gadi VK, Specht JM, et al. A phase 2 study of 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol positron emission tomography (FES-PET) as a marker of hormone sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16:431–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-013-0699-7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gennari A, Brain E, De Censi A, Nanni O, Wuerstlein R, Frassoldati A, et al. Early prediction of endocrine responsiveness in ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): pilot study with (18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES) CT/PET. Ann Oncol. 2024;35:549–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.007.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van Geel JJL, Boers J, Elias SG, Glaudemans A, de Vries EFJ, Hospers GAP, et al. Clinical Validity of 16α-[(18)F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Assess Estrogen Receptor Status in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3642–52. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.00400.
Shin E, Han S, Ryu J, Eom HJ, Choi WJ, Ahn JH, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FES PET/CT for the Detection of Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000005447.
Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im SA, Gelmon K, et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1925–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607303.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, Sohn J, Paluch-Shimon S, Huober J, et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3638–46. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.75.6155.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tripathy D, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:904–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30292-4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang P, Zhang Q, Tong Z, Sun T, Li W, Ouyang Q, et al. Dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole versus placebo plus letrozole or anastrozole as first-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (DAWNA-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:646–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00172-9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xie Y, Du X, Zhao Y, Gong C, Hu S, You S, et al. Chemotherapy shows a better efficacy than endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients with a heterogeneous estrogen receptor expression assessed by 18F-FES PET. Cancers. 2022;14:3531.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parihar AS, Vaz S, Sutcliffe S, Pant N, Schoones JW, Ulaner GA. (18)F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J Nucl Med. 2025;66:692–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269163.
Yang Z, Sun Y, Xu X, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Xue J, et al. The Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Status and Its Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Patients With Breast Cancer by Using 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:421–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000001587.
Aide N, Lasnon C, Veit-Haibach P, Sera T, Sattler B, Boellaard R. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3740-2.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mankoff D, Balogová S, Dunnwald L, Dehdashti F, DeVries E, Evangelista L, et al. Summary: SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[(18)F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:221–3. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266938.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Ha MJ, Singareeka Raghavendra A, Kettner NM, Qiao W, Damodaran S, Layman RM, et al. Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy significantly enhances overall survival of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients compared to endocrine therapy alone in the second-line setting: A large institutional study. Int J Cancer. 2022;150:2025–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33959.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rugo HS, Brufsky A, Liu X, Li B, McRoy L, Chen C, et al. Real-world study of overall survival with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022;8:114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-022-00479-x.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rugo HS, Liu X, Li B, McRoy L, Chen C, Layman RM, et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib Plus Aromatase Inhibitors in African American Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2023;28:866–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad209.
Comments (0)