Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75(1):10–45.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hamoen EHJ, de Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Use of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1112–21.
Bjurlin MA, Mendhiratta N, Wysock JS, Taneja SS. Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment. Cent Eur J Urol. 2016;69(1):9–18.
Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815–22.
Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, PRECISION Study Group Collaborators, et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767–77.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, et al. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(5):697–713.
Donato P, Morton A, Yaxley J, Teloken PE, Coughlin G, Esler R, et al. Improved detection and reduced biopsies: the effect of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based triage prostate cancer pathway in a public teaching hospital. World J Urol. 2020;38(2):371–9.
Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, et al. EAUEANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2024;86(2):148–63.
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, et al. PI-RADS prostate imaging: reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol. 2016;69(1):16–40.
Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S, Bernardo M, Greer MD, Mertan FV, et al. What are we missing? False-negative cancers at multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology. 2018;286(1):186–95.
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, et al. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1466–86.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, et al. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):403–17.
Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2024;86(2):164–82.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, et al. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Quarta L, Chen DC, Thomson A, Barletta F, et al. A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Primary Staging before Definitive Treatment. Eur Urol. 2025;87(6):654–71.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lopci E, Saita A, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Colombo P, Buffi NM, et al. 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with contraindications to or negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective observational study. J Urol. 2018;200:95–103.
Lopci E, Lughezzani G, Castello A, Saita A, Colombo P, Hurle R, et al. Prospective evaluation of 68Galabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7:764–71.
Lopci E, Lughezzani G, Castello A, Colombo P, Casale P, Saita A, et al. PSMA-PET and micro-ultrasound potential in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(1):172–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lopci E, Lazzeri M, Colombo P, Casale P, Buffi NM, Saita A, et al. Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of PSMA PET/CT versus mpMRI in Patients with a High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer and Previously Negative Biopsy: A Prospective Trial (PROSPET-BX). Urol Int. 2023;107(5):433–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eder M, Neels O, Müller M, Bauder-Wüst U, Remde Y, Schäfer M, et al. Novel Preclinical and Radiopharmaceutical Aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: A New PET Tracer for Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014;7(7):779–96.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rahbar K, Weckesser M, Huss S, Semjonow A, Breyholz HJ, Schrader AJ, et al. Correlation of intraprostatic tumor extent with Ga-PSMA distribution in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(4):563–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fendler WP, Schmidt DF, Wenter V, Thierfelder KM, Zach C, Stief C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detects the location and extent of primary prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(11):1720–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(2):244 – 52.
Emmett L, Papa N, Buteau J, Ho B, Liu V, Roberts M, et al. The PRIMARY score: using Intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT patterns to optimize prostate cancer diagnosis. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1644–50.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics. 1997;53:567–78.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saitta C, Garofano G, Musso G, Tanaka H, Patil D, Nguyen V, et al. UNIK (Urologic Non-Neoplastic Investigation of Kidneys): a machine learning approach to decode benign lesion. World J Urol. 2025;43:355.
Vickers AJ, Holland F. Decision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of prediction models. Spine J. 2021;21:1643–8.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Buteau JP, Moon D, Fahey MT, Roberts MJ, Thompson J, Murphy DG, et al. Clinical Trial Protocol for PRIMARY2: A Multicentre, Phase 3, Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Additive Diagnostic Value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Men with Negative or Equivocal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024;7(3):544–52.
Guo S, Zhang J, Wang Y, Jiao J, Li Z, Cui C, et al. Avoiding unnecessary biopsy: the combination of PRIMARY score with prostate-specific antigen density for prostate biopsy decision. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27:288–93.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
https://www.usdanalytics.com/industry-reports/prostate-biopsy-market
Washington C, Goldstein DA, Moore A, Gardner U Jr, Deville C Jr. Health Disparities in Prostate Cancer and Approaches to Advance Equitable Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:1–6.
Comments (0)