Kafka IZ, Kocherov S, Jaber J et al (2019) Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter? Pediatr Surg Int 35:391–396

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esposito C, Cerulo M, Lepore B et al (2023) Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg 17(4):1239–1246

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alqarni NH, Alyami FA, Alshayie MA et al (2024) Minimally invasive versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric population: comparative retrospective study in tertiary centre. Urol Annals 16(3):215–217

Google Scholar 

Passoni NM, Peters CA (2020) Managing ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the young infant. Front Pediatr 8:242

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Greenwald D, Mohanty A, Andolfi C et al (2022) Systematic review and meta-analysis of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 36(4):448–461

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang M, Xi Y, Huang N et al (2023) Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 11:e16468

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chandrasekharam V, Babu R, Arlikar J et al (2021) Functional outcomes of pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: post-operative functional recovery is superior in infants compared to older children. Pediatr Surg Int 37:1135–1139

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Penn HA, Gatti JM, Hoestje SM et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 184(2):690–695

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M et al (2019) Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results. J Pediatric Urol 15(6):667.e1-e8

Google Scholar 

Planchamp T, Bento L, Mouttalib S et al (2023) Robotic pyeloplasty learning curve for a pediatric surgeon without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience. J Robot Surg 17(6):2955–2962

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salö M, Bonnor L, Graneli C et al (2022) Ten years of paediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 18(4):e2386

Google Scholar 

Wong YS, Pang KKY, Tam YH (2021) Comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants aged 12 months or less. Front Pediat 9:647139

Google Scholar 

Pakkasjärvi N, Krishnan N, Ripatti L et al (2022) Learning curves in pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty: a systematic review. J Clin Med 11(23):6935

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cundy TP, Harling L, Hughes-Hallett A et al (2014) Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children. BJU Int 114(4):582–594

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang S-J, Hsu C-K, Hsieh C-H et al (2015) Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 33:1855–1865

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pakkasjärvi N, Taskinen S (2021) Introduction of pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a low-volume centre. Clin Pract 11(1):143–150

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun M, Yu C, Zhao J et al (2023) The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 39(1):265

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Varda BK, Johnson EK, Clark C et al (2014) National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol 191(4):1090–1096

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Melnyk M, Casey RG, Black P et al (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: time to change practice? Can Urol Assoc J 5(5):342

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Meng C, Gan L, Li K et al (2022) Comparison of external stents and DJ stents techniques for pediatric pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr 10:933845

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chandrasekharam V, Babu R (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants. J Pediatr Urol 17(4):502–510

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Casella DP, Fox JA, Schneck FX et al (2013) Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 189(3):1083–1086

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohamed HE, EL-Asmar KM, Hassan TA et al (2022) Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty in children: Ain Shams University early experience. Annals Pediat Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43159-022-00164-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Kallidonis P, Gkeka K, Tatanis V et al (2024) Novel robotic platforms for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology: a narrative review. J Endourol 38(7):652–660

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ortiz-Seller D, Panach-Navarrete J, Valls-González L et al (2024) Comparison between open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol 20(2):244–252

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blanc T, Abbo O, Vatta F et al (2022) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. A multicentre, prospective study. Eur Urol Open Sci 41:134–140

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oktar T, Selvi I, Dönmez Mİ et al (2024) What to expect on the long-term follow-up of pediatric pyeloplasty: critical time intervals and risk factors. J Pediatr Surg 59(6):1170–1176

PubMed  Google Scholar