Enhanced and express workflows in robotic total hip arthroplasty: A paired accuracy study using radiographic validation

Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pabinger C, Lothaller H, Portner N, Geissler A (2018) Projections of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries up to 2050. Hip Int 28:498–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018757940

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matharu GS, Culliford DJ, Blom AW, Judge A (2022) Projections for primary hip and knee replacement surgery up to the year 2060: an analysis based on data from the National joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of man. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 104:443–448. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0206

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD (1979) Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:639–652

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Röder C, Vogel R, Burri L et al (2012) Total hip arthroplasty: leg length inequality impairs functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-95

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Keršič M, Dolinar D, Antolič V, Mavčič B (2014) The impact of leg length discrepancy on clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty: comparison of four measurement methods. J Arthroplasty 29:137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA et al (2003) Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200312000-00007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sykes A, Hill J, Orr J et al (2015) Patients’ perception of leg length discrepancy post total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 25:452–456. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000276

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahmood SS, Mukka SS, Crnalic S et al (2016) Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. A prospective cohort study of 222 patients. Acta Orthop 87:36–41. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1091955

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robinson M, Bornstein L, Mennear B et al (2012) Effect of restoration of combined offset on stability of large head THA. Hip Int 22:248–253. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2012.9283

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Worlicek M, Messmer B, Grifka J et al (2020) Restoration of leg length and offset correlates with trochanteric pain syndrome in total hip arthroplasty. Sci Rep 10:7107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62531-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bullock EKC, Brown MJ, Clark G et al (2022) Robotics in total hip arthroplasty: current concepts. J Clin Med 11:6674. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226674

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

St Mart J-P, Goh EL, Shah Z (2020) Robotics in total hip arthroplasty: a review of the evolution, application and evidence base. EFORT Open Rev 5:866–873. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.200037

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kamara E, Robinson J, Bas MA et al (2017) Adoption of robotic vs fluoroscopic guidance in total hip arthroplasty: is acetabular positioning improved in the learning. Curve? J Arthroplasty 32:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.039

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kong X, Yang M, Jerabek S et al (2020) A retrospective study comparing a single surgeon’s experience on manual versus robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty after the learning curve of the latter procedure - A cohort study. Int J Surg 77:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.067

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY et al (2014) Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Connor PB, Thompson MT, Esposito CI et al (2021) The impact of functional combined anteversion on hip range of motion: a new optimal zone to reduce risk of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2:834–841. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0117.R1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kayani B, Konan S, Thakrar RR et al (2019) Assuring the long-term total joint arthroplasty: a triad of variables. Bone Joint J 101–B:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0377.R1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nawabi DH, Conditt MA, Ranawat AS et al (2013) Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 227:302–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411912468540

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, He W, Cheng T, Zhang X (2015) Total hip arthroplasty: leg length discrepancy affects functional outcomes and patient’s gait. Cell Biochem Biophys 72:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-0440-4

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Konyves A, Bannister GC (2005) The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:155–157. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.14878

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Annapareddy A, Mulpur P, Jayakumar T et al (2024) A radiological comparison of Robotic-Assisted versus manual techniques in total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 58:1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01232-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schneider A, Molina M, Pitz-Gonçalves LI et al (2025) Does replicating native hip biomechanics improve Patient-Reported outcome measures after total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 40:S143–S151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.063

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shapira J, Chen SL, Rosinsky PJ et al (2020) The effect of postoperative femoral offset on outcomes after hip arthroplasty: A systematic review. J Orthop 22:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.034

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Masilamani ABS, Mulpur P, Jayakumar T et al (2024) Operating room efficiency for a high-volume surgeon in simultaneous bilateral robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Robot Surg 18:188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01947-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao X, Wang X-H, He R-X et al (2025) [Comparison of outcomes between enhanced workflows and express workflows in robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty]. Zhongguo Gu Shang 38:987–993. https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250514

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carender CN, Hegde V, Levine BR et al (2025) Highlights of the 2024 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Arthroplast Today 33:101727 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2025.101727

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Lewis PL et al (2024) University of Adelaide Medical School, Hip, Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2024 Annual Report. Australian Orthopaedic Association

Hardwick-Morris M, Wigmore E, Twiggs J et al (2022) Leg length discrepancy assessment in total hip arthroplasty: is a pelvic radiograph sufficient? Bone Jt Open 3:960–968. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.312.BJO-2022-0146.R1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif