Abdelkafy H, Mohammed A, Nada P. Canal transportation and centering ratio of paediatric vs regular files in primary teeth. Int Dent J. 2022;73(4):2 3-4 2 9.

Google Scholar 

Abdelshafy R, Mahran A, Fahim M. Comparative study of dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of two files with different kinematics. Int Arab J Dent. 2024;15(2):28–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahn S-Y, Kim H-C, Kim E. Kinematic effects of Nickel-Titanium instruments with reciprocating or continuous rotation motion: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2016;42(7):1009–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akshata SH, Priya N, Maithil K, Sanjanadevi A. Comparison of the efficacy of two different rotary files in pediatric dentistry: original research. Int J Pedod Rehabil. 2025;9(2):62–75. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjpedorehab.v9i2.1192.

Article  Google Scholar 

Albuquerque M, Nascimento A, Braz R, Gialain I, Lima EA, Nery J, et al. Canal transportation, centering ability, and dentin removal after instrumentation: a micro-CT evaluation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20:806–11. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2601.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2024. p. 466–74.

Basturk FB, Özyürek T, Uslu G, Gündoğar M. Mechanical properties of the new generation RACE EVO and R-Motion nickel–titanium instruments. Materials. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093330.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

El Hachem C, Kaloustian MK, Nehme W, Ghosn N, Abou Chedid JC. Three-dimensional modeling and measurements of root canal anatomy in second primary mandibular molars: a case series micro CT study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(5):457–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00426-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eldemery N, Elshehawy O, Nasr R, Badr M. Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness after manual and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness after manual and rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone beam rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone beam computed tomography. Future Dent J. 2021;7(2):95–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eldesouky S, Fahl B, Kabbash I, Hadwa S. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of Kedo-S Square and Fanta AFTM baby rotary files compared to manual k-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05726-y.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eter M, Abiad R. Transportation and canal centering ability of reciprocating vs full rotating files after instrumenting severely curved canals. A cone beam computed tomography comparative study. Ann Stomatol. 2024;15(3):145–54.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fumes A, Sousa-Neto M, Leoni G, Versiani M, Silva L, Silva R, et al. Root canal morphology of primary molars: a micro-computed tomography study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-014-0117-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7):369–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80221-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Assessment of quality of obturation, instrumentation time and intensity of pain with pediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) in primary anterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;11:462–7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.

Article  Google Scholar 

Haddad G, Adhami M, Nehmé W, Naaman A, Khalil I. Apical transportation and centering ability: a comparison of two-single file systems after instrumentation to the major foramen and after overinstrumentation in curved root canals. Int Arab J Dent. 2018;9(2):53–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Haridoss S, Swaminathan K, Rakkesh K. Computed tomographic assessment of remaining dentin and risk of perforation after Kedo-S and Mtwo rotary instrumentation in root canals of primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15:S87-91. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2217.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jayam C, Thakur S, Ahammed H, Singhal P. Comparative evaluation of dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of hand K file, ProTaper rotary file, and Kedo S rotary file in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13:332–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(1):21–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_247_17.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jindal L, Bhat N, Mehta S, Bansal S, Sharma S, Kumar A. Rotary endodontics in pediatric dentistry: literature review. Int J Health Biol Sci. 2020;3:9–13.

Google Scholar 

Kaushik H, Singhal R, Kakram A. Rotary file systems designed exclusively for pediatric patients: a literature review. Int J Health Sci Res. 2023;13:212–6. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20230730.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar S, Naik S, Vashisth P, Sharma S, Singh S. Comparative evaluation of hand, rotary and reciprocation motion on dentin thickness and instrumentation time in primary anterior teeth using CBCT: an observational study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(5):e396. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60347.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kurthukoti A, Sharma P, Swamy D, Raju S, Swamy E. Computed tomographic morphometry of the internal anatomy of mandibular second primary molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8:202–7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1313.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kwak SW, Lee C-J, Kim SK, Kim H-C, Ha J-H. Comparison of screw-in forces during movement of endodontic files with different geometries, alloys, and kinetics. Materials. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091506.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lim SS, Stock CJR. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J. 1987;20(1):33–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohamed RH, Abdelrahman AM, Sharaf AA. Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02021-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Musale P, Mujawar S. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;15(2):113–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Navós BV, Hoppe CB, Mestieri LB, Böttcher D, Só MV, Grecca F. Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19:478. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190008.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oz E, Gulseren Timur B, Cetin ES, Bilir G. Effectiveness of pediatric rotary, rotary and reciprocating instrumentations on bacterial load reduction in primary molars: an ex vivo comparative study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47(2):30–9. https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2023.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison between the effectiveness of rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12:340–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1637.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Patloth T, Naidu D, Reddy JS, Suhasini K, Chandrika I, Shaik H. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the quality of obturation using different pediatric rotary file systems in primary teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:542–7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2000.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Prabhakar AR, Yavagal C, Dixit K, Naik SV. Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):45–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Prakash V, Antony A, Mitthra S, Venkatesh A, Vivekanandhan P, Subbiya A. Comparison of centring ability of different rotary and reciprocating systems-an in vitro study. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10:1603. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02335.0.

Article  Google Scholar