Salem H, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Zhang M, Usui E, Seike F, et al. Reasons for lesion uncrossability as assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;99:2028–37.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

McQuillan C, Jackson MWP, Brilakis ES, Egred M. Uncrossable and undilatable lesions—a practical approach to optimizing outcomes in PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:121–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ikari Y, Nagaoka M, Kim J-Y, Morino Y, Tanabe T. The physics of guiding catheters for the left coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17:636–41.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yokoi K, Mizote I, Shiraki T, Ide S, Mukai T, Nakamura D, et al. Differences in routes of guiding catheters for left coronary artery according to access sites assessed by the combined angiography-computed tomography system. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021;36:298–306.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software EZR for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carr ML. The use of the guiding catheter in coronary angioplasty: the technique of manipulating catheters to obtain the necessary power to cross tight coronary stenoses. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1986;12:189–97.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nesto RW. Performance characteristics of a new shape of guiding catheter for ptca of the left coronary artery. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1991;24:144–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shubrooks SJ. Improved support for right coronary artery angioplasty with a new guiding catheter. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;27:325–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Voda J. Long-tip guiding catheter: successful and safe for left coronary artery angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;27:234–42.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ochiai M, Ikari Y, Yamaguchi T, Isshiki T, Koyama Y, Eto K, et al. New long-tip guiding catheters designed for right transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;49:218–24.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoang V, Urban P, Chatelain P, Metz D, Camenzind E, Brzostek T, et al. Randomized evaluation of six French Voda-type guiding catheters for left coronary artery balloon angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;35:53–6.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ikari Y, Masuda N, Matsukage T, Ogata N, Nakazawa G, Tanabe T, et al. Backup force of guiding catheters for the right coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:570–4.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takeshita S, Takagi A, Saito S. Backup support of the mother–child technique: technical considerations for the size of the mother guiding catheter. Cathet Cardio Intervent. 2012;80:292–7.

Google Scholar 

Takeshita S, Shishido K, Sugitatsu K, Okamura N, Mizuno S, Yaginuma K, et al. In vitro and human studies of a 4F double-coaxial technique (“Mother-Child” configuration) to facilitate stent implantation in resistant coronary vessels. Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011;4:155–61.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takahashi S, Saito S, Tanaka S, Miyashita Y, Shiono T, Arai F, et al. New method to increase a backup support of a 6 French guiding coronary catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63:452–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kameda S, Okamura A, Sakata Y, Fujii K. Guide catheter extension lock enables the strongest backup force during the antegrade approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020;35:177–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharei H, Alderliesten T, Van Den Dobbelsteen JJ, Dankelman J. Navigation of guidewires and catheters in the body during intervention procedures: a review of computer-based models. J Med Imaging. 2018;5:1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang W, Wan Z, Wu B, Lu L, Tang Y. Finite element analysis for mechanics of guiding catheters in transfemoral intervention. J Card Surg. 2019;34:690–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG, Buchholz AL, Au AG. Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93:1057–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tajima A, Bouisset F, Ohashi H, Sakai K, Mizukami T, Rizzini ML, et al. Advanced CT imaging for the assessment of calcific coronary artery disease and PCI planning. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2024;3:101299.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ybarra LF, Rinfret S, Brilakis ES, Karmpaliotis D, Azzalini L, Grantham JA, et al. Definitions and clinical trial design principles for coronary artery chronic total occlusion therapies: CTO-ARC consensus recommendations. Circulation. 2021;143:479–500.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tanaka Y, Moriyama N, Ochiai T, Takada T, Tobita K, Shishido K, et al. Transradial coronary interventions for complex chronic total occlusions. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017;10:235–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A, Bernat I, Jobe R, Kajiya T, et al. Comparison of a new slender 6 Fr sheath with a standard 5 Fr sheath for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT), a randomised multicentre trial. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:e549–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eddin MJ, Armstrong EJ, Javed U, Rogers JH. Transradial interventions with the GuideLiner catheter: role of proximal vessel angulation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013;14:275–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Numasawa Y, Kohsaka S, Ueda I, Miyata H, Sawano M, Kawamura A, et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiol. 2017;69:272–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Büchler JR, Ribeiro EE, Falcão JL, Martinez EE, Büchler RD, Feres F, et al. A randomized trial of 5 versus 7 French guiding catheters for transfemoral percutaneous coronary stent implantation. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21:50–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013;8:1242–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gargiulo G, Giacoppo D, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Le May M, Bernat I, et al. Effects on mortality and major bleeding of radial versus femoral artery access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis of individual patient data from 7 multicenter randomized clinical trials. Circulation. 2022;146:1329–43.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yoshimachi F. Backup Support of Slender Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guiding Catheter. In: Yoshimachi F, editor. Slender PCI. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020. pp. 57–67.

Chapter  Google Scholar