Cardiac damage stages and prognosis in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve: insights from the CURRENT AS Registry-2

Toyofuku M, Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, Yamaji K, Furukawa Y, Takahashi K, et al. Sex differences in severe aortic stenosis: clinical presentation and mortality. Circ J. 2017;81:1213–21. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1244.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, Takeji Y, Shirai S, Ando K, Tabata H, et al. Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:471–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.044.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, rwin JP, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. Volume 143. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2021. pp. E35–71. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932.

Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yoon S-H, Lefèvre T, Ahn J-M, Perlman GY, Dvir D, Latib A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early-and new-generation devices in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.041.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montalto C, Sticchi A, Crimi G, Laricchia A, Khokhar AA, Giannini F, et al. Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:2144–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.052.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Généreux P, Pibarot P, Redfors B, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Jaber WA, et al. Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3351–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx381.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vollema EM, Amanullah MR, Ng ACT, van der Bijl P, Prevedello F, Sin YK, et al. Staging cardiac damage in patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:538–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.048.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tastet L, Tribouilloy C, Maréchaux S, Vollema EM, Delgado V, Salaun E, et al. Staging cardiac damage in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:550–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.065.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amanullah MR, Pio SM, Ng ACT, Sin KYK, Marsan NA, Ding ZP, et al. Prognostic implications of associated cardiac abnormalities detected on echocardiography in patients with moderate aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:1724–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.04.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dahl JS, Julakanti R, Ali M, Scott CG, Padang R, Pellikka PA. Cardiac Damage in Early Aortic Stenosis: Is the Valve to Blame? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Elsevier Inc. 2024;17:1031–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.05.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Okuno T, Heg D, Lanz J, Praz F, Brugger N, Stortecky S, et al. Refined staging classification of cardiac damage associated with aortic stenosis and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021;7:532–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab041.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takeji Y, Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, Shirai S, Kitai T, Tabata H, et al. Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the CURRENT AS Registry-2. Circulation J Japanese Circulation Soc. 2023;87:1146–9. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-66-0215.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lang RM, Badano LP, Victor MA, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiography Mosby Inc. 2015;28:1–e3914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, Gill E, Prueitt A, Byers PH, et al. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart. 2008;94:1634–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.132092.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mazur P, Wypasek E, Gawęda B, Sobczyk D, Kapusta P, Natorska J, et al. Stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves: micro-computed tomography and biological indices of calcification. Circ J. 2017;81:1043–50. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1166.

Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Ramlawi B, Gleason TG, Meduri CU, Yakubov SJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves from the STS/ACC TVT registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1749–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Webb JG, Doshi D, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Smith CR, Pichard AD, et al. A randomized evaluation of the SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve system in patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1797–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.017.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1609–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1514616.

Abdelfattah OM, Jacquemyn X, Sá MP, Jneid H, Sultan I, Cohen DJ, et al. Cardiac damage staging predicts outcomes in aortic valve stenosis after aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis. JACC Adv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100959.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dutta P, James JF, Kazik H, Lincoln J. Genetic and developmental contributors to aortic stenosis. Circ Res Lippincott Williams Wilkins. 2021;128:1330–43. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317978.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Shan Y, Li J, Wang Y, Wu B, Barker AJ, Markl M, et al. Aortic shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis and insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1263-1272.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.059

Kostyunin AE, Yuzhalin AE, Ovcharenko EA, Kutikhin AG. Development of calcific aortic valve disease: do we know enough for new clinical trials? J Mol Cell Cardiol Acad Press. 2019;132:189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.05.016.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Yan AT, Koh M, Chan KK, Guo H, Alter DA, Austin PC, et al. Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Aortic Stenosis: The CANHEART Aortic Stenosis Study. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;69:1523–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.025.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Makkar RR, Yoon SH, Chakravarty T, Kapadia SR, Krishnaswamy A, Shah PB, et al. Association between transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid vs tricuspid aortic stenosis and mortality or stroke among patients at low surgical risk. JAMA. 2021;326:1034–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.13346.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hirji SA, Wegermann Z, Vemulapalli S, Newell P, Grau-Sepulveda M, O’Brien S, et al. Benchmarking outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2023;116:1222–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.06.026.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huntley GD, Thaden JJ, Alsidawi S, Michelena HI, Maleszewski JJ, Edwards WD, et al. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex211.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif