Aiyegbusi, O. L. (2020). Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems. Quality of Life Research, 29(2), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02329-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Ambagtsheer, R. C., Archibald, M. M., Lawless, M., Kitson, A., & Beilby, J. (2020). Feasibility and acceptability of commonly used screening instruments to identify frailty among community-dwelling older people: A mixed methods study. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01551-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Andreasen, J., Sørensen, E. E., Gobbens, R. J. J., Lund, H., & Aadahl, M. (2014). Danish version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator - Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validity pretest by cognitive interviewing. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 59(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.02.007

Article  Google Scholar 

Ayala, A., Rodríguez-Blázquez, C., Frades-Payo, B., Forjaz, M. J., Martínez-Martín, P., Fernández-Mayoralas, G., & Rojo-Pérez, F. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Apoyo Social Funcional y de la Escala de Soledad en adultos mayores no institucionalizados en España. Gaceta Sanitaria, 26(4), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.08.009

Article  Google Scholar 

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

Article  Google Scholar 

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Article  Google Scholar 

Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006

Article  Google Scholar 

Belloni, G., & Cesari, M. (2019). Frailty and intrinsic capacity: Two distinct but related constructs. Frontiers in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMED.2019.00133

Article  Google Scholar 

Borell-Carrió, F., Suchman, A. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2004). The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.245

Article  Google Scholar 

Castro, J. W., Astudillo, A. I., & Rojas, L. (2025). Identification of older adults’ characteristics that affect the usability of mobile applications: a tertiary study. In A. Coman & S. Vasilache (Eds.), Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2025 (Vol. 15786, pp. 37–56). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93539-8_3

Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., Lundy, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Revicki, D. A., Lenderking, W. R., Cella, D., & Basch, E. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report. Value in Health, 12(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Czaja, S. J., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2020). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC. Third Edition.

De Witte, N., Gobbens, R., De Donder, L., Dury, S., Buffel, T., Schols, J., & Verté, D. (2013a). The comprehensive frailty assessment instrument: Development, validity and reliability. Geriatric Nursing, 34(4), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.03.002

Article  Google Scholar 

De Witte, N., Gobbens, R., De Donder, L., Dury, S., Buffel, T., Verté, D., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2013b). Validation of the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument against the Tilburg Frailty Indicator. European Geriatric Medicine, 4(4), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2013.03.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Eremenco, S., Coons, S. J., Paty, J., Coyne, K., Bennett, A. V., & McEntegart, D. (2014). PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: Report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force. Value in Health, 17(5), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.06.005

Article  Google Scholar 

Espinoza, S. E., Quiben, M., & Hazuda, H. P. (2018). Distinguishing comorbidity, disability, and frailty. Current Geriatrics Reports, 7(4), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13670-018-0254-0

Article  Google Scholar 

European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (2021). The 2021 Ageing Report. Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2019–2070). https://doi.org/10.2765/84455

Article  Google Scholar 

Garre-Olmo, J., Calvó-Perxas, L., López-Pousa, S., De Gracia Blanco, M., & Vilalta-Franch, J. (2013). Prevalence of frailty phenotypes and risk of mortality in a community-dwelling elderly cohort. Age and Ageing, 42(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs047

Article  Google Scholar 

Gobbens, R. J. J., Van Assen, M. A. L. M., Luijkx, K. G., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2012). The predictive validity of the tilburg frailty indicator: Disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. Gerontologist, 52(5), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONT/GNR135

Article  Google Scholar 

Gobbens, R. J. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2010). Determinants of frailty. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 11(5), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.008

Article  Google Scholar 

Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value in Health, 11(2), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Hasnan, S., Aggarwal, S., Mohammadi, L., & Koczwara, B. (2022). Barriers and enablers of uptake and adherence to digital health interventions in older patients with cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 13(8), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2022.06.004

Article  Google Scholar 

Hernández, A., Hidalgo, M. D., Hambleton, R. K., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2020). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoeyberghs, L. J., Schols, Jos, M. G. A., Verté, D., De Witte, Nico, Smetcoren, A. S., Dury, S., De Donder, L., De Witte, N., Dierckx, E., Lambotte, D., Fret, B., Duppen, D., Kardol, M., Verté, D., Hoeyberghs, L. J., De Witte, N., De Roeck, E., Engelborghs, S., De Deyn, P. P., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2020). Psychological Frailty and Quality of Life of Community Dwelling Older People: A Qualitative Study. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(5), 1395–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11482-019-09735-Y/TABLES/1

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang, E. Y., & Lam, S. C. (2021). Review of frailty measurement of older people: Evaluation of the conceptualization, included domains, psychometric properties, and applicability. Aging Medicine, 4(4), 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12177

Article  Google Scholar 

Imani, M., Khajeh, M., Khosravi, A., & Ebrahimi, H. (2021). Validation of the Persian version of the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument plus in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 42(6), 1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.09.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2024). Proyecciones de Población. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/Prensa/es/PROP20242074.htm

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2025). Indicadores Demográficos Básicos. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/Prensa/MNP2024.htm

International Test Commission (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). https://www.InTestCom.org.

Kulmala, J., Nykänen, I., & Hartikainen, S. (2014). Frailty as a predictor of all-cause mortality in older men and women. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 14(4), 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12190

Article  Google Scholar 

Lambotte, D., De Donder, L., De Roeck, E. E., Hoeyberghs, L. J., Van Der Vorst, A., Duppen, D., Van Der Elst, M., Fret, B., Dury, S., Smetcoren, A. S., Kardol, M. J. M., Engelborghs, S., De Deyn, P. P., De Witte, N., Schols, J. M. G. A., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Zijlstra, G. A. R., De Lepeleire, J., Schoenmakers, B., & Dierckx, E. (2018). Randomized controlled trial to evaluate a prevention program for frail community-dwelling older adults: A D-SCOPE protocol. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0875-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Mcdowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires (Third Edition). Oxford University Press.

Mowlem, F. D., Elash, C. A., Dumais, K. M., Haenel, E., O’Donohoe, P., Olt, J., Kalpadakis-Smith, A. V., James, B., Balestrieri, G., Becker, K., Newara, M. C., & Kern, S. (2024). Best practices for the Electronic Implementation and Migration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Value in Health, 27(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.007

Article  Google Scholar 

Muehlhausen, W., Doll, H., Quadri, N., Fordham, B., O’Donohoe, P., Dogar, N., & Wild, D. J. (2015). Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24

Article  Google Scholar 

O’Caoimh, R., Galluzzo, L., Rodríguez-Laso, Á., Van Der Heyden, J., Ranhoff, A. H., Lamprini-Koula, M., Ciutan, M., Samaniego, L. L., Carcaillon-Bentata, L., Kennelly, S., & Liew, A. (2018). Prevalence of frailty at population level in European ADVANTAGE Joint Action Member States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 54(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_18_03_10

Article  Google Scholar 

Qiao, X., Wang, C., Tian, X., Dong, L., Liu, N., Jin, Y., & Si, H. (2018). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 18(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13183

Article  Google Scholar 

Rentería, E., & Zueras, P. (2022). Macro-level factors explaining inequalities in expected years lived free of and with chronic conditions across Spanish regions and over time (2006–2019). SSM - Population Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101152

Article  Google Scholar 

Sinabell, I., & Ammenwerth, E. (2024). Challenges and recommendations for eHealth usability evaluation with elderly users: Systematic review and case study. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(1), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00949-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Sugie, M., Harada, K., Nara, M., Kugimiya, Y., Takahashi, T., Kitagou, M., Kim, H., Kyo, S., & Ito, H. (2022). Prevalence, overlap, and interrelationships of physical, cognitive, psychological, and social frailty among community-dwelling older people in Japan. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104659