Bot SD, van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Schellevis FG, Bouter LM, Dekker J (2005) Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice. Ann Rheum Dis 64(1):118–123
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396(10258):1204–22
Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, Buchbinder R, Mansournia MA, Bettampadi D et al (2020) Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990–2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ 368:m791
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chang EM, Gillespie EF, Shaverdian N (2019) Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 10:171–186
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
de Vet HCW TC, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Responsiveness. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Johansen JB, Roe C, Bakke E, Mengshoel AM, Andelic N (2014) Reliability and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the neck disability index. Scand J Pain 5(1):28–33
Johansen JB, Andelic N, Bakke E, Holter EB, Mengshoel AM, Roe C (2013) Measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the neck disability index in chronic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(10):851–856
Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai JS, Terluin B, Cella D et al (2021) Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res 30(10):2729–2754
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heide M, Mørk M, Fenne Hoksrud A, Brox JI, Røe C (2023) Responsiveness of specific and generic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with plantar fasciopathy. Disabil Rehabil 1–7
Copay AG, Eyberg B, Chung AS, Zurcher KS, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part II: lower extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 6(9):e2
Bjørneboe J, Bratsberg A, Brox JI, Skatteboe S, Wilhelmsen M, Samuelsen KM et al (2024) Symptom burden and follow-up of patients with neck and back complaints in specialized outpatient care: a national register study. Sci Rep 14(1):3855
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aars NA, Brandseth O, Bardal I, Stevelink S, Sanatkar S, Trichet LO et al (2025) Cohort profile: the Norwegian neck and back registry (NNRR): a medical quality registry for patients with neck and back complaints. BMJ Open 15(3):e096992
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seymour RA (1982) The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 23(5):441–444
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability index. J Rehabil Med 35(5):241–247
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3115–3124
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14(7):409–415
Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G (2009) Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 17(3):163–170
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Devji T, Carrasco-Labra A, Qasim A, Phillips M, Johnston BC, Devasenapathy N et al (2020) Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study. BMJ 369:m1714
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Vet HCW TC, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Interpretability. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 227–74
Wang Y, Devji T, Carrasco-Labra A, King MT, Terluin B, Terwee CB et al (2023) A step-by-step approach for selecting an optimal minimal important difference. BMJ 381:e073822
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592
Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D (1999) Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the health utilities index mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 15(2):141–155
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bobos P, MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Gross A, Santaguida PL (2018) Patient-reported outcome measures used for neck disorders: an overview of systematic reviews. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 48(10):775–788
Saltychev M, Pylkas K, Karklins A, Juhola J (2024) Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil 1–17
Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM (2008) Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(1):69–74
Young IA, Dunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Cleland JA (2019) Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms. Physiother Theory Pract 35(12):1328–1335
Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD (2009) Responsiveness of the neck disability index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J 9(10):802–808
Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Vernon H, Brunati R, Rocca B, Foti C, Ferrante S (2015) Responsiveness and minimal important changes for the neck disability index and the neck pain disability scale in Italian subjects with chronic neck pain. Eur Spine J 24(12):2821–2827
Langenfeld A, Gassner AP, Wirth B, Mühlemann MB, Nyirö L, Bastiaenen C, Swanenburg J (2022) Responsiveness of the German version of the neck disability index in chronic neck pain patients: a prospective cohort study with a seven-week follow-up. Arch Physiother 12(1):23
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(1):90–94
Maughan EF, Lewis JS (2010) Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 19(9):1484–1494
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Braten LCH, Grovle L, Wigemyr M, Wilhelmsen M, Gjefsen E, Espeland A et al (2022) Minimal important change was on the lower spectrum of previous estimates and responsiveness was sufficient for core outcomes in chronic low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 151:75–87
King MT (2011) A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11(2):171–184
Grøvle L, Haugen AJ, Hasvik E, Natvig B, Brox JI, Grotle M (2014) Patients’ ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status. J Clin Epidemiol 67(5):508–515
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB (2021) COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 30(8):2197–2218
Franceschini M, Boffa A, Pignotti E, Andriolo L, Zaffagnini S, Filardo G (2023) The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods. Am J Sports Med 51(4):1067–1073
Comments (0)