Di Carli MF, Springer. Changing epidemiology of CAD: why should we pay attention? J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28(2):386–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02560-7.
Kadrmas DJ, Di Bella EVR, Khare HS, Christian PE, Gullberg GT. Static versus dynamic teboroxime myocardial perfusion SPECT in canines. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;47(3):1112–7.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Di Bella EV, Ross SG, Kadrmas DJ, et al. Compartmental modeling of technetium-99m-labeled teboroxime with dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography: comparison with static thallium-201 in a canine model. Invest Radiol. 2001;36(3):178–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200103000-00007.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Iida H, Eberl S. Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial blood flow with thallium-201 and SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:313–31.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Iida H, Eberl S, Kim KM, et al. Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow with (201)Tl and dynamic SPECT in canine: optimisation and validation of kinetic modelling. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(5):896–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0654-4.
Gullberg GT, Reutter BW, Sitek A, Maltz JS, Budinger TF. Dynamic single photon emission computed tomography–basic principles and cardiac applications. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(20):R111–91. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/R01.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chiao PC, Ficaro EP, Dayanikli F, Rogers WL, Schwaiger M. Compartmental analysis of technetium-99m-teboroxime kinetics employing fast dynamic SPECT at rest and stress. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(8):1265–73.
Otaki Y, Manabe O, Miller RJH, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with 15O-water PET. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28(4):1477–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01854-1.
Cuddy-Walsh SG, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, Wells RG. Improved precision of SPECT myocardial blood flow using a net tracer retention model. Med Phys. 2023;50(4):2009–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16186.
Wells RG, Timmins R, Klein R, et al. Dynamic SPECT measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in a porcine model. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(10):1685–91. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.139782.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chng AC, Keng BM, Teng XF, et al. Going beyond summed stress scores: correlating global and territorial coronary flow reserve by single photon emission tomography with routine myocardial perfusion imaging. Heliyon. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29629.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Han S, Kim YH, Ahn JM, et al. Feasibility of dynamic stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(12):2173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4057-5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wieting W, Bengel FM, Diekmann J. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03339-4.
Ferenczi P, Couffinhal T, Mamou A, et al. Myocardial blood flows and reserves on solid state camera: correlations with coronary history and cardiovascular risk factors. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022;29(4):1671–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02659-x.
Bailly M, Thibault F, Courtehoux M, Metrard G, Angoulvant D, Ribeiro MJ. Myocardial flow reserve measurement during CZT-SPECT perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease screening: correlation with clinical findings and invasive coronary angiography—the CFR-OR study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.691893.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ben-Haim S, Murthy VL, Breault C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: a feasibility study. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:873–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.109652.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Miyagawa M, Nishiyama Y, Uetani T, et al. Estimation of myocardial flow reserve utilizing an ultrafast cardiac SPECT: comparison with coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve, and the SYNTAX score. Int J Cardiol. 2017;244:347–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.012.
Shiraishi S, Tsuda N, Sakamoto F, et al. Clinical usefulness of quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve using CZT-SPECT for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with normal stress perfusion imaging. J Cardiol. 2020;75(4):400–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.09.006.
Zavadovsky KV, Mochula AV, Maltseva AN, et al. The diagnostic value of SPECT CZT quantitative myocardial blood flow in high-risk patients. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022;29(3):1051–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02395-8.
Liu FS, Wang SY, Shiau YC, Wu YW. Integration of quantitative absolute myocardial blood flow estimates from dynamic CZT-SPECT improves the detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022;29(5):2311–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02713-8.
de Souza AC do AH, Gonçalves BKD, Tedeschi AL, Lima RSL. Quantification of myocardial flow reserve using a gamma camera with solid-state cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors: Relation to angiographic coronary artery disease. J Nuclear Cardiol. 2021;28(3):876–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01775-z.
Iguchi N, Utanohara Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Myocardial flow reserve derived by dynamic perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography reflects the severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;34(9):1493–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1358-5.
Zhang J, Xie J, Li M, Fang W, Hsu B. SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation for the detection of angiographic stenoses with cardiac-dedicated CZT SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03334-z.
Zavadovsky KV, Mochula AV, Boshchenko AA, et al. Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy. J Nuclear Cardiol. 2021;28(1):249–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z.
Acampa W, Assante R, Mannarino T, et al. Low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(7):1705–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04644-6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Panjer M, Dobrolinska M, Wagenaar NRL, Slart RHJA. Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CZT-SPECT in coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Nuclear Cardiology Springer. 2022;29(4):1686–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02721-8.
Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(18):1639–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076.
Wells RG, Marvin B, Poirier M, Renaud JM, DeKemp RA, Ruddy TD. Optimization of SPECT measurement of myocardial blood flow with corrections for attenuation, motion, and blood-binding compared to PET. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:2013–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.191049.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Giubbini R, Bertoli M, Durmo R, et al. Comparison between N13NH3-PET and 99mTc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28(5):1906–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01939-x.
Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, et al. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99m Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15 O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1079–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7.
Comments (0)