Sasaki Y, Kusuhara Y, Oyama T, Nishiyama M, Kobayashi S, Daizumoto K et al (2024) Radical prostatectomy using the Hinotori robot-assisted surgical system: Docking-free design may contribute to reduction in postoperative pain. Int J Med Rob Comput Assist Surg 20(3):e2648

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee AY, Loh EKY, Yu L, Chen K, Loo AWR, Brodie BA et al (2025) Transitioning to hinotori™ robotic surgical system: early clinical outcomes and technical insights of a complete robotic platform switch. J Robotic Surg 19(1):760

Article  Google Scholar 

Krauss DT, Brunner S, Eckhoff JA, Storms C, Babic B, Schulz T et al (2025) Evaluation of posture in four different robotic surgical systems. Surg Endosc

Biau DJ, Williams SM, Schlup MM, Nizard RS, Porcher R (2008) Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM. Br J Surg 95(7):925–929

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park K, Kwon JY, Yoo E-H, Lee SH, Song JM, Pyeon SY (2024) Application of CUSUM analysis in assessing learning curves in robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy performed by experienced gynecologist. BMC Surg 24(1):385

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sultana A, Nightingale P, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP (2019) Evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study between standard and learning curve CUSUM. HPB (Oxford) 21(11):1505–1512

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Novoa NM, Varela G (2020) Monitoring surgical quality: the cumulative sum (CUSUM) approach. Mediastinum 4:4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu J, Wang Y, Huang Y, Long X, Tang J, Gu D (2025) Learning curve analysis of extraperitoneal single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a CUSUM-based approach. J Robot Surg 19(1):49

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lenfant L, Corrigan D, Beksac AT, Schwen Z, Kaouk J (2021) Learning curve analysis of single-port robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. BJU Int 128(6):688–691

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee AYM, Yang XY, Lee HJ, Law YM, Huang HH, Lau WKO et al (2020) Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy. BJU Int 126(5):568–576

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ et al (2019) Eur Urol 76(3):340–351Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2

van Leenders G, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ, Evans AJ, Kristiansen G, Kweldam CF et al (2020) The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 44(8):e87-e99

978-94-92671-23-3. EGEpatEACPI. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris (2024) ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3.;EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3.(EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3.):EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3

Ng TK, Low AWX, Yuen JSP (2019) Sandwiched posterior-anterior reconstructed tissue-glued anastomosis (SPARTAN) in RARP: a consistently reproducible urethro-vesical anastomosis for early catheter removal and continence recovery. Urol Video J 4:100019

Article  Google Scholar 

Gall TMH, Alrawashdeh W, Soomro N, White S, Jiao LR (2020) Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves. BJS Open 4(6):1100–1108

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rahimi AM, Uluç E, Hardon SF, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Daams F (2024) Training in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of training modalities and objective and subjective assessment methods. Surg Endosc 38(7):3547–3555

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting–the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174(1):269–272

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, Lee D, Nilsson A, Tewari AK (2011) Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol 63(3):191–198

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bravi CA, Dell’Oglio P, Piazza P, Scarcella S, Bianchi L, Falagario U et al (2024) Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration. Eur Urol Oncol 7(4):821–828

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gandi C, Totaro A, Bientinesi R, Marino F, Pierconti F, Martini M et al (2022) A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training. J Robotic Surg 16(6):1451–1461

Article  Google Scholar 

Olsen RG, Karas V, Bjerrum F, Konge L, Stroomberg HV, Dagnæs-Hansen JA et al (2024) Skills transfer from the DaVinci® system to the Hugo™ RAS system. Int Urol Nephrol 56(2):389–397

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nagai T, Etani T, Shimizu N, Gonda M, Aoki M, Morikawa T et al (2024) Learning curve of multiple surgeons for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the cumulative sum method: a retrospective single-institution study. J Robot Surg 18(1):389

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sukumar S, Rogers CG, Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sood A, Stricker H et al (2014) Oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up in 4803 patients. BJU Int 114(6):824–831

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tholomier C, Bienz M, Hueber PA, Trinh QD, Hakim AE, Alhathal N et al (2014) Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases: The largest Canadian 5-year experience. Can Urol Assoc J 8(5–6):195–201

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):382–404

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT (1992) Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 148(2 Pt 1):331–337

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Udo K, Cronin AM, Carlino LJ, Savage CJ, Maschino AC, Al-Ahmadie HA et al (2013) Prognostic impact of subclassification of radical prostatectomy positive margins by linear extent and Gleason grade. J Urol 189(4):1302–1307

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen K, Lee A, Tan YG, Lim EJ, Khor V, Yong D et al (2025) A narrative review and proposed framework for robotic surgical training in Urology for Southeast Asia (SEA): a qualitative survey and expert panel recommendations. J Robotic Surg 19(1):710

Article  Google Scholar 

Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA et al (2011) Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59(5):702–707

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Assel M, Sjoberg D, Elders A, Wang X, Huo D, Botchway A et al (2019) Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology. Eur Urol 75(3):358–367

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar