Skolarikos A, Neisius HJA, Petřík A, Somani B, Tailly T G. Gambaro. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3

Xu F, Zhong R, Zhong W, Ye S, Lu Z, Xiong L et al (2025) First application of a 6.3 Fr flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of bilateral staghorn calculi: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 104:e43524. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000043524

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Urology EAo EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Madrid 2025. ISBN 978-94-92671-29-5

Turedi B, Sezer A (2024) Comparison of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath with conventional ureteral access sheath for pediatric retrograde intrarenal surgery: a single-center propensity-matched analysis. Urolithiasis 53:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01686-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geavlete PA, Bulai CA, Multescu RD, Ene CV, Militaru A, Punga AA et al (2025) Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device. Sci Rep 15:15362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00515-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Association WM (2025) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. JAMA 333:71–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21972

Article  Google Scholar 

Chow SCSJ, Wang H (2008) In: Dekker M (ed) Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Research. Marcel Dekker, New York

Google Scholar 

Şahin MF, Topkaç EC, Şeramet S, Doğan Ç, Yazıcı CM (2024) The efficacy and safety of three different single-use ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a comparative analysis of a single surgeon’s experience in a single center. World J Urol 42:583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05283-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lavoie CA, Levine M, Schuler TD, Wollin TA, De S (2021) Understanding failures in getting it up: the prevalence and predictors of failed ureteral access in ureteroscopy. Can Urol Assoc J 15:E135-e8. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6059

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu W, Wan W, Yang J, Amier Y, Li X, Zhang J et al (2024) For upper ureteral stone, semirigid ureteroscopy or flexible ureteroscopy? Strengths and weaknesses. BMC Urol 24:261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01647-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–26

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, Liu W, Zhu J, Huang T et al (2019) The effect of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter on intrapelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Endourol 33:132–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0774

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi J, Huang T, Song B, Liu W, Cheng Y, Fang L (2024) The optimal ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter with negative-pressure ureteral access sheath: an in vitro research. World J Urol 42:122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04815-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lopes ACN, Dall’Aqua V, Carrera RV, Molina WR, Glina S (2021) Intra-renal pressure and temperature during ureteroscopy: does it matter? Int Braz J Urol 47:436–42. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.Ibju.2020.0428

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xiong L, Kwan KJS, Xu X, Wei GG, Wang MC, Lu ZQ (2024) First use and evaluation of a novel 6.3 Fr disposable flexible ureteroscope for stone management in duplex kidney: a case report. Transl Androl Urol 13:2644–50. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-315

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abushamma F, Abu Alwafa R, Zyoud SH (2025) Sheathless RIRS in the era of slim and single use flexible ureteroscopy (ssFURS): prospective analysis of clinical outcome. Urologia 92:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241282734

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kwok JL, Somani B, Sarica K, Yuen SKK, Zawadzki M, Castellani D et al (2024) Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group. Urolithiasis 52:162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01662-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yuen SKK, Traxer O, Wroclawski ML, Gadzhiev N, Chai CA, Lim EJ et al (2024) Scoping review of experimental and clinical evidence and its influence on development of the suction ureteral access sheath. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101034

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gauhar V, Madarriaga YQ, Somani B, Joshi R, Tanidir Y, Castellani D et al (2024) Is flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) the next best development for retrograde intrarenal surgery in children? Results of a prospective multicentre study. World J Urol 42:627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05337-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu Q, Liu H, Chen K, Yang W, Ru W, Yan X (2025) Ureteral stents in the management of pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0442

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

AlKattan W, Sabbah BN, Alghafees MA, Sabbah AN, Alsaleem A, Alqahtani MA et al (2024) Pediatric anesthesia exposure: decoding its neurodevelopmental implications and navigating the nuances. Cureus 16:e55952. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.55952

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun R, Sommer E, Ganesan C, Pao AC, Liao J, Leppert J et al (2025) Limitations of ultrasound compared with computed tomography for kidney stone surveillance. Can Urol Assoc J 19:E229-e37. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9043

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wei B, Guo Z, Yu Y, Gan S, Wang Z, Bai Z et al (2025) A comparative analysis of flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000003697

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Proietti S, Giusti G, Desai M, Ganpule AP (2017) A critical review of miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is smaller better? Eur Urol Focus 3:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.001

Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK (2012) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones > 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 26:1257–63. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0217

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Jiang K, Liu S, Wu R, Duan X, Chai CA et al (2025) Flexible Ureteroscopy with a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2–3 cm Renal Stones: An International, Multicenter, Randomized. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.06.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wiseman O, Smith D, Starr K, Aucott L, Hernández R, Thomas R et al (2025) The PUrE randomised controlled trial 1: clinical and cost effectiveness of flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole stones of ≤ 10 mm. Eur Urol 88:179–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.002

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ge H, Zheng X, Na Y, Hou X, Yu C, Ding W et al (2016) Bilateral same-session ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 30:1169–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0472

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar