Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150(3699):971–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967;46(4):489–91.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kumar K, Taylor R, Jacques L, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain. 2007;132(1–2):179–88.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, et al. Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):851–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deer T, Slavin KV, Amirdelfan K, et al. Success using neuromodulation with BURST (SUNBURST) study: results from a prospective, randomized controlled trial using a novel burst waveform. Neuromodulation. 2018;21(1):56–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

North JM, Hong KJ, Cho PY. Clinical outcomes of 1 kHz subperception spinal cord stimulation in implanted patients with failed paresthesia-based stimulation: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(7):731–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fishman M, Cordner H, Justiz R, et al. Twelve-month results from multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and traditional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic intractable back pain and leg pain. Pain Pract. 2021;21(8):912–23.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thomson SJ, Tavakkolizadeh M, Love-Jones S, et al. Effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the PROCO randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation. 2018;21(1):67–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paz-Solís J, Thomson S, Jain R, Chen L, Huertas I, Doan Q. Exploration of high- and low-frequency options for subperception spinal cord stimulation using neural dosing parameter relationships: the HALO study. Neuromodulation. 2022;25(1):94–102.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kriek N, Groeneweg JG, Stronks DL, de Ridr D, Huygen FJ. Preferred frequencies and waveforms for spinal cord stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled crossover trial. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(3):507–19.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duse G, Reverberi C, Dario A. Effects of multiple waveforms on patient preferences and clinical outcomes in patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for leg and/or back pain. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(2):200–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berg AP, Mekel-Bobrov N, Goldberg E, Huynh D, Jain R. Utilization of multiple spinal cord stimulation (SCS) waveforms in chronic pain patients. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(8):663–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rigoard P, Billot M, Bougeard R, et al. Improved outcomes and therapy longevity after salvage using a novel spinal cord stimulation system for chronic pain: multicenter, observational, European case series. J Clin Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041079.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rigoard P, Ounajim A, Moens M, et al. Should we oppose or combine waveforms for spinal cord stimulation in PSPS-T2 patients? A prospective randomized crossover trial (MULTIWAVE study). J Pain. 2023;24(12):2319–39.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kallewaard JW, Paz-Solis JF, De Negri P, et al. Real-world outcomes using a spinal cord stimulation device capable of combination therapy for chronic pain: a European, multicenter experience. J Clin Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184085.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wallace MS, North JM, Phillips GM, et al. Combination therapy with simultaneous delivery of spinal cord stimulation modalities: COMBO randomized controlled trial. Pain Manag. 2023;13(3):171–84.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blakemore C, Carpenter RH, Georgeson MA. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature. 1970;228(5266):37–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Angelucci A, Levitt JB, Lund JS. Anatomical origins of the classical receptive field and modulatory surround field of single neurons in macaque visual cortical area V1. Prog Brain Res. 2002;136:373–88.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tinazzi M, Priori A, Bertolasi L, Frasson E, Mauguière F, Fiaschi A. Abnormal central integration of a dual somatosensory input in dystonia. Evidence for sensory overflow. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 1):42–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hillman P, Wall PD. Inhibitory and excitatory factors influencing the receptive fields of lamina 5 spinal cord cells. Exp Brain Res. 1969;9(4):284–306.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang TC, Janik JJ, Grill WM. Modeling effects of spinal cord stimulation on wide-dynamic range dorsal horn neurons: influence of stimulation frequency and GABAergic inhibition. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112(3):552–67.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gilbert JE, Titus N, Zhang T, Esteller R, Grill WM. Surround inhibition mediates pain relief by low amplitude spinal cord stimulation: modeling and measurement. eNeuro. 2022;9(5):ENEURO.0058–22.2022.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Metzger CS, Hammond MB, Paz-Solis JF, et al. A novel fast-acting sub-perception spinal cord stimulation therapy enables rapid onset of analgesia in patients with chronic pain. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18(3):299–306.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bayerl S, Paz-Solis J, Matis G, et al. Two-year outcomes using fast-acting, sub-perception therapy for spinal cord stimulation: a European, real-world, multicenter experience. J Clin Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226999.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Metzger C, Hammond B, Ferro R, et al. Two-year outcomes using fast-acting sub-perception therapy for spinal cord stimulation: results of a real-world multicenter study in the United States. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2453554.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deer TR, Falowski SM, Moore GA, et al. Passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation provides sustainable improvements in pain and psychosocial function: 2-year results from the TRIUMPH study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(7):548–56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rigoard P, Ounajim A, Goudman L, et al. A novel multi-dimensional clinical response index dedicated to improving global assessment of pain in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery, based on a real-life prospective multicentric study (PREDIBACK) and machine learning techniques. J Clin Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214910.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kapural L, Mekhail NA, Costandi S, et al. Durable multimodal and holistic response for physiologic closed-loop spinal cord stimulation supported by objective evidence from the EVOKE double-blind randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024;49(4):233–40.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Levy RM, Mekhail N, Abd-Elsayed A, et al. Holistic treatment response: an international expert panel definition and criteria for a new paradigm in the assessment of clinical outcomes of spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2023;26(5):1015–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boonstra AM, Stewart RE, Köke AJ, et al. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the numeric rating scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: variability and influence of sex and catastrophizing. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1466.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25:2940–52.

Article  CAS  PubMed